MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7133283466

Biophysical and Ecological Overview of the Offshore Haida Gwaii Network Zones

2024· other· en· W7133283466 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Pêches et Océans Canada, Haida Nation

Bibliographic record

VenueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du Canada · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFisheries and Oceans Canada
KeywordsSubmarine pipelineGroundfishBiodiversityHabitatMarine protected areaContinental shelfBiogeographyMarine conservationSeafloor spreading
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report and the associated Research Document were co-authored and co-produced with the Council of the Haida Nation. Haida knowledge and language was woven throughout from the Haida Marine Traditional Knowledge Study and the Haida language authorities. This does not represent the totality of Haida knowledge. Throughout the document where possible, names of places and species are provided in two dialects of Haida, X̲aad Kíl and X̲aayda Kil, and English in italics. To differentiate between the two Haida dialects, X̲aad Kíl is in blue text, and X̲aayda Kil is in green text. The Offshore Haida Gwaii Network Zones (OHGNZ) are a group of seven offshore marine zones off Duu Gúusd Daawxuusda the west coast of Haida Gwaii and in Síigee Dixon Entrance in the Pacific Region. Four zones (Zones 505, 504, 503 and 502) are located on the continental slope offshore of Duu Gúusd Daawxuusda and cover a large depth range. Three zones are located in Síigee on the continental shelf and have the shallowest depth distribution (Zones 506, 501 and 500; see Figure 1). Spatial data regarding the oceanography, ecology, species distribution, human use, and projected changes to environmental variables and groundfish distributions with climate change of the OHGNZ were compiled and summarized. The OHGNZ cover areas of steep terrain and transition from shelf to slope to bathyal plain habitat with distinct oceanographic and ecological processes, unique ecosystem features, and biodiverse assemblages of marine species. Species groups and/or species of ecological and cultural conservation importance that occur in the OHGNZ include: corals and sponges, groundfish (including at least 26 K̲ʹats Sgaadang.nga rockfish species), at least 13 marine mammal species, ʹWaahúu Tang.ɢ̲wan Siiga Leatherback Sea Turtle, and at least 36 species of X̲edíit Siigaay x̲idid marine birds. The zones overlap, or are in close proximity to, seven Ecologically and Biologically Significant Areas (EBSAs), have strong current and eddy action, overlap with two rocky outcrops (Tsaan K̲waay Learmonth Bank and K̲adlee Celestial Reef), and include the only documented seamount in the Northern Shelf Bioregion. More information on the uniqueness of these zones and projected impacts of climate change are provided in the “Climate Change Impacts” and “Conservation Significance” sections and Table 1 in this report, and the accompanying Research Document3. Knowledge gaps and uncertainties have been identified to the best of the authors’ knowledge to help in prioritizing future research. The OHGNZ were selected as part of the Marine Protected Area Network in the Northern Shelf Bioregion and are ecologically connected to a variety of bathymetric features and marine populations both within and outside of the region through oceanographic processes. Consequently, there are science recommendations herein that may inform future alterations to zone boundaries (e.g., inclusion of entire bathymetric features and ecosystem representativity).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.855
Threshold uncertainty score0.289

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du Canada→French-language works237,207→