MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133284597

Stock assessment of Whelks in Quebec : results from the commercial fishery (1987-2024) and scientific surveys (2005-2024)

2023· other· en· W7133284597 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bruno L. Gianasi

Bibliographic record

VenueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du Canada · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFishingWhelkStock (firearms)Catch per unit effortStock assessmentRecreational fishing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Waved whelk, Buccinum undatum, is a gastropod mollusc found along the Estuary and Gulf of St. Lawrence. In Quebec, it can reach a shell height of 120–130 mm, but individuals larger than 105 mm are increasingly rare. Its growth rate is fairly slow and its life span is at least 15 years. There are 15 whelk fishing areas in Quebec. The whelk fishery is an inshore fishery that uses traps. It focuses essentially on Buccinum undatum, although some other species of Buccinum are present. The fishery is regulated by the number of licences, the number of traps and the minimum legal size which varies according to the fishing areas. Quotas on landings are in place in six areas. The stock status is determined primarily based on commercial fishery indicators. In 2024, Quebec landings totalled 407 t, of which 73% were from the North Shore, 24% from the Magdalen Islands and 4% from the Gaspé Peninsula–Lower St. Lawrence. Landings had decreased in most fishing areas compared to 2019-2021. For areas managed by a total allowable catch (TAC), it has never or very rarely been reached in areas 1, 2, 12, 13 and 15. The average catch per unit effort (CPUE) in 2022–2024 was below the historical average (2002–2021) in areas 1 (-24%), 2 (-40%), 3 (-54%), 4 (-16%), 5 (-29%), 6 (-34%), 7 (-54%) and 8 (-19%) on the North Shore; in areas 12 (-60%) and 13 (-50%) in the Gaspé–Lower St. Lawrence region; and in area 15 (-28%) in the Magdalen Islands. The status of these stocks is worrisome, with downward trends and local decreases in CPUE values observed in most areas. These stocks do not appear to be able to sustain the current fishing effort and consequently are vulnerable to overfishing and local depletion. Following a recent assessment of size at sexual maturity in a number of fishing areas, the minimum legal size was increased in 2023 in areas 4, 5, 6, 7 (from 80 to 85 mm) and areas 8, 11, 12 and 14 (from 75 to 80 mm), and in 2024 in area 13 (from 75 to 80 mm). These changes could partly explain the decline in landings and CPUE values observed in recent years. In the past few years, the proportion of sub-legal-size whelk landed has been below 5% in all fishing areas, except for areas 2 (2022–2023), 4 (2022–2023), 6 (2023), 7 (2024) and 8 (2022, 2023 and 2024). The densities of legal-size whelk and juvenile recruits observed in the research survey (conducted every two years) in 2024 in areas 1 and 2 on the Upper North Shore were lower than those in the 2022 survey, and are among the lowest values in the time series (2005–2024).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.138

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du CanadaFrench-language works237,207