MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7133284928

Further results of comparative fishing between the Canadian Coast Guard Ship (CGSS) Teleost and CCGS Capt Jacques Cartier/John Cabot in the Newfoundland and Labrador Region in Fall, with a focus on deep water species

2025· other· en· W7133284928 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
S. Trueman, T. Nguyen, K. Silver, K. R. Skanes, L. Wheeland

Bibliographic record

VenueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du Canada · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoast guardFishingTaxonGuard (computer science)Deep water
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Comparative fishing has been ongoing since 2021 in the Newfoundland and Labrador Region as the multispecies survey transitions to new vessels, the Canadian Coast Guard Ship (CCGS) Capt Jacques Cartier and CCGS John Cabot. Analysis of this program was considered across two CSAS peer review meetings. Here we present results from Part II as they relate to the fall survey. Data collected in 2023, when added to previously collected data from 2021–22, were sufficient to estimate an additional seven deep water taxa conversions for the CCGS Teleost fall time series. Sixteen deep water taxa were determined to require no conversion. Additionally, following the recommendations from Part I, several taxa groupings were modified and reassessed for both the CCGS Teleost and CCGS Alfred Needler. Based on these regroupings, an additional eight conversion factors were determined for the CCGS Teleost and nine for the CCGS Alfred Needler.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score0.267

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du Canada→French-language works237,207→