MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7133286598

Utilisation de la surveillance acoustique passive à partir de planeurs pour la détection en temps quasi réel des baleines noires de l'Atlantique Nord (Eubalaena glacialis) pour supporter la gestion des zones de navigation dynamiques du chenal Laurentien et de la zone de ralentissement volontaire du détroit de Cabot (2021-2022).

2022· other· en· W7133286598 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Frederick Whoriskey, Kimberley T. A. Davies, Adam Comeau, Katherine L. Indeck

Bibliographic record

VenueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du Canada · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFisheries and Oceans CanadaDalhousie UniversityPublic Works and Government Services CanadaTransport Canada
KeywordsGliderBaleenAerial surveyHydrophoneWhaleRight whale
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This project used right whale detections from gliders to trigger dynamic vessel management in the traffic separation scheme within Dynamic Shipping Zone C (DSZ C) and the Cabot Strait Voluntary Slow Zone. Two profiling gliders equipped with hydrophone systems were deployed for 116 and 107-day missions, respectively, from July 6th – November 9th, 2021. The gliders reported daily detections of four baleen whale species that were validated by a trained human analyst and then sent to Transport Canada. The glider detected right whales in DSZ C on fourteen survey days, and the Cabot Strait on two survey days. In response to the glider detections, a speed limit was imposed in DSZ C for 72 days, or 62.1% of the survey period. The false positive rates for right whale detections at the daily scale were 7% and 0%, and the false negative rates for this species at the daily scale were 5% and 1%, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du Canada→French-language works237,207→