MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7133287830

Stock definition and genetic composition of Cumberland Sound beluga whales (Delphinapterus leucas)

2023· other· en· W7133287830 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cortney A. Watt, Luca Montana, Justine Hudson, Geneviève J. Parent

Bibliographic record

VenueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du Canada · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeluga WhaleBelugaEndangered speciesSound (geography)Right whalePopulationThreatened speciesGenetic monitoring
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Less than 1,500 beluga whales (Delphinapterus leucas) are estimated to be in Cumberland Sound. These whales, considered as a single population of beluga, have been listed as Threatened under the Species at Risk Act and recently assessed as Endangered by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. This beluga whale group has been defined based on satellite tracking data, contaminants, morphometrics, and previous genetic analyses. However, questions regarding whether multiple populations of beluga whales visit Cumberland Sound, their genetic stock discrimination, and the timing of migration and distribution of whales from different groups within Cumberland Sound remain. A recent reexamination of a long haplotype of the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) control region showed greater discrimination among beluga whale populations in Eastern Canada, including a small subsample of whales harvested from Cumberland Sound. In this study, we reexamined the genetic distinctiveness of beluga whales hunted in Cumberland Sound (N = 208) compared with other Eastern Arctic whales (N = 657), analyzing all samples collected from this area with the long haplotype of mtDNA. We also genotyped a subsample of whales harvested in Cumberland Sound (N = 27) and Western Hudson Bay (N = 121) using 12,370 nuclear DNA (nDNA) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to investigate their distinctiveness. Our results using mtDNA confirmed that approximately 35% of beluga whales harvested in July and August from Cumberland Sound had haplotypes private to this region. The rest of the harvested whales had haplotypes shared with other populations from the Hudson Bay-Strait Complex. Nuclear DNA results also suggested the presence of two populations in Cumberland Sound during summer with approximately 74% of the whales belonging to the CSB population. The degree of differentiation between the CSB and WHB populations was low (FST=0.014), but this is expected given the recent colonization of the Hudson Bay-Strait Complex. Our results support that there are two populations of beluga whales that summer in Cumberland Sound. Based on all current information, managing beluga whales inhabiting Cumberland Sound in the summer as a single stock comprised of two genetic populations is the most precautionary approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.930
Threshold uncertainty score0.139

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du Canada→French-language works237,207→