MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ARTVİN / ŞAVŞAT / CEVİZLİ KÖYÜ KIRSAL SİT ALANI VE GELENEKSEL KONUT MİMARİSİNİN İNCELENMESİ

2025· book-chapter· W7133308070 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ebru Omay Polat, Melis Bilgiç Elmas, Aylin AKÇABOZAN

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistory and Cultural Heritage
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Period (music)Work (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bu çalışma, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Rölöve ve Restorasyon Yüksek Lisans Programı kapsamında, 2023–2024 öğretim yılı güz ve bahar yarıyıllarında yürütülen Tarihi Çevre Değerlendirme Stüdyosu çerçevesinde gerçekleştirilen belgeleme çalışmalarına dayanmaktadır. Çalışmanın amacı, Doğu Karadeniz Bölgesi’nde yer alan Artvin ili Şavşat ilçesine bağlı Cevizli Köyü’nün yerleşim dokusu ile geleneksel konut mimarisine ait özgün mimari ve yapım özelliklerini analiz etmektir. Dağınık yerleşim düzenine sahip olan köy, geniş ormanlık alan- lar içinde, topoğrafyaya uyumlu biçimde konumlanarak özgün bir tarihi kırsal peyzaj örneği sunmaktadır. Yerleşimin merkezinde yer alan ve 10. yüzyıla tarihlenen Tibeti Manastırı, bölgenin Gürcü mimari mirasına ışık tutarken; geleneksel konut örneklerinde ahşap yığma (çantı) yapım sistemine özgü detaylar dikkat çekmektedir. Bu yapılarda kullanılan büyük kesitli ahşap elemanlarla oluşturulan heykelsi detaylar, yapım tekniğinin karakteristik özelliklerini yansıtırken; yapı elemanlarında gözlemlenen özgün ahşap işçiliği, köyün hem somut hem de somut olmayan kültürel mirasını günümüze taşımaktadır.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.097

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHistory and Cultural HeritageFrench-language works237,207