MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

JEE 360 - Empowering JEE Aspirants Through AI-Driven Personalized Learning and Instant Doubt Resolution

2025· article· W7133310216 on OpenAlexaff
Rathesha S M, Nithya Shree R, Iswarya K, Jeyaseelan R

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVariety (cybernetics)AdaptabilityQuality (philosophy)Key (lock)ArchitectureSession (web analytics)Personalized learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

JEE360 is one of the most advanced AI virtual assistants designed for students preparing for the JEE and other competitive engineering examinations in India. The system is trained on advanced Large Language Model (LLM for short) and subsequently customized using key academic materials like NCERT textbooks, JEE guidebooks, and previous examination papers. JEE360 instantly resolves and summarizes complex concepts, and other topic specific questions and provides topicwise personalized context-specific quizzes. The system synthesizes RAG (retrieval-augmented generation) and CAG (cacheaugmented generation) methods to dynamically obtain pertinent information and to efficiently recycle “high-confidence” answers. The JEE360 also uses the LangChain architecture to manage the orchestrated reasoning of document loaders, embeddings, and pipelines, so that the processes of data retrieval and answer generation run in a coordinated and seamless manner. More than all of these more complex features, JEE360 is capable of offering streamlined support to students of all levels and backgrounds in order to provide quality JEE preparation and adaptability to a variety of learners.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.906
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdversarial Robustness in Machine LearningFrench-language works237,207