MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Text-Independent Speaker Verification Employing A Novel Hybrid Neural Embedding Extractor

2025· article· W7133331044 on OpenAlexaff
Jahangir Alam, Md Shahidul Alam

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech Recognition and Synthesis
Canadian institutionsComputer Research Institute of Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscriminative modelRobustness (evolution)Pattern recognition (psychology)Convolutional neural networkEmbeddingArtificial neural networkFeature extractionFeature (linguistics)Softmax functionPooling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reliable and discriminative speaker embedding extraction lies at the heart of modern neural automatic speaker verification (ASV) systems. In this study, we introduce a novel hybrid neural architecture that enhances embedding quality by integrating frequency- and channel-aware Selective Kernel Attention (SKA) into a 2D convolutional neural network (2D-CNN) feature extractor. This design strengthens the joint modeling of frequency and channel characteristics, resulting in more discriminative speaker representations. The feature extractor feeds into a composite frame-level network, structured as a cascade of Time-Delay Neural Network (TDNN)–Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) hybrid and fully TDNN layers. To summarize speaker traits at the utterance level, we employ Multi-Level Attentive Statistics Pooling (MLASP), which captures diverse statistical cues and exploits the complementary strengths of the hybrid architecture. MLASP further improves robustness by recovering subtle, previously underutilized features. The full system is trained using the additive angular margin softmax (AAMSoftmax) loss, which promotes tighter intra-speaker clustering and broader inter-speaker separation in the embedding space. We also explore the influence of different CNN-driven feature learning modules on ASV performance and resilience. Evaluations on the VoxCeleb and CNCeleb benchmarks confirm that our proposed method consistently surpasses both standard baselines and state-of-the-art ASV models trained under the same conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpeech Recognition and SynthesisFrench-language works237,207