HERL: Tiered Federated Learning with Adaptive Homomorphic Encryption using Reinforcement Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Federated Learning is a well-researched approach for collaboratively training machine learning models across decentralized data while preserving privacy. However, applying homomorphic encryption at the client side–before upload of model updates–introduces significant computational and communication overheads, particularly in heterogeneous environments where clients have varying computational capacities and security needs. In this paper, we propose HERL, a Reinforcement Learningbased approach that uses Q-Learning to dynamically optimize encryption parameters, specifically the polynomial modulus degree,$N$, and the coefficient modulus,$q$, across different client tiers. Our proposed method involves first profiling and tiering clients according to the chosen clustering approach, followed by dynamically selecting the most suitable encryption parameters using an RL-agent. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach significantly reduces the computational overhead while maintaining utility (model accuracy) and a high security-bit. Empirical results show that HERL improves utility (model performance) by 17%, reduces the convergence time by up to$\mathbf{2 4 \%}$, and increases convergence efficiency by up to 30%, with minimal potenital security loss.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".