Aplicando a gestão de riscos a edifícios históricos e acervos móveis da Casa de Oswaldo Cruz
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O presente trabalho tem como objetivo apresentar os resultados do primeiro ciclo de implantação da gestão de riscos para os bens culturais sob responsabilidade da Casa de Oswaldo Cruz / Fiocruz. Para realização do ciclo-piloto foi criado um Grupo de Trabalho multidisciplinar e selecionados três edifícios históricos tombados pelo IPHAN e três acervos móveis. A metodologia adotada para o desenvolvimento do trabalho foi o Método ABC desenvolvido pelo CCI - Canadian Conservation Institute e ICCROM - International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property com colaboração do Instituto Holandês do Patrimônio Cultural. O desenvolvimento do trabalho contemplou a realização de cinco etapas sequenciais: estabelecimento do contexto, identificação, análise, avaliação e tratamento dos riscos.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.050 | 0.017 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".