MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133393706

Oral History, Memory and the Folklore of Contemporary (Australian) Poverty

2004· article· en· W7133393706 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRUNE (Research UNE) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicOral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFolklorePovertyWifeQuarter (Canadian coin)State (computer science)DutyWork (physics)WelfareWelfare state
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this country in the spring of 2004, and on the eve of a Federal Election, it is very clear to many that the long-held 'Australian Dream' a nice (brick) house in the suburbs, on a quarter of an acre block, and with a manageable mortgage steadily and not too painfully reducing, with two children and with a wife who can easily join the work force when this is appropriate - is a possibility slowly slipping out of the grasp of husbands and wives in Middle Australia. In view of this new social reality, it may well be timely to reflect on the passing of an egalitarian Australian society, arguably as achieved for so many in the 1960s and 1970s, before the welfare state concept was deemed to have grown old and tired.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.680
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.159
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRUNE (Research UNE)Same topicOral History, Memory, Narrative AnalysisFrench-language works237,207