MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133415288

International Legal Framework: Annex A

2005· other· en· W7133415288 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M Tsamenyi, S Kaye, G. Rose, B Snushall, C Mark Moore, K Mfodwo, L Munoz

Bibliographic record

VenueRUNE (Research UNE) · 2005
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConventionUnited Nations Convention on the Law of the SeaInternational lawFreedom of navigationSovereigntyLaw of the seaSovereign immunityMontreal Protocol
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter examines the application of International Instruments that impose environmental requirements on RAN operations. The chapter also discusses the concept of Sovereign Immunity with respect to these Instruments. The following International Instruments are discussed:• United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 1982.• International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL) 1973/78.• United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 1994.• Montreal Protocol 1989. Of these instruments, by far the most significant to naval ship design and operations is MARPOL. However, issues arising from each of these instruments will be considered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score0.354

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0060.008
Science and technology studies0.0060.003
Scholarly communication0.0170.008
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0200.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1060.080

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.439
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRUNE (Research UNE)French-language works237,207