Bactéries pathogènes et organismes indicateurs dans la pâte d'herbes fraîches réfrigérée - Du 1er avril 2021 au 31 mars 2024
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A targeted survey analyzed 147 samples of refrigerated fresh herb paste over a 3-year period from April 1, 2021, to March 31, 2024, for the presence of the pathogens Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella spp., and E. coli O157. All samples were also tested for generic E. coli which is used as an indicator of the overall hygienic and sanitary conditions of the food supply chain from production to the point of sale. All (100%) of the 147 samples tested were found to be satisfactory. L. monocytogenes, Salmonella spp., and E. coli O157 were not found in any of the samples. Generic E. coli at elevated levels were not found in any of the samples. Overall, our survey results indicate that refrigerated fresh herb pastes sold in Canada are generally safe for consumption. However, as with all foods, and especially those that are ready-to-eat, good hygienic practices are recommended for producers, retailers, and consumers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".