MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133436789

Plateformes numériques de participation citoyenne, une opportunité pour la gouvernance de la smart city ?

2019· article· fr· W7133436789 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueORBi UMONS · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Cities and Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Work (physics)PlacemakingAction (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plateformes numriques de participation citoyenne, une opportunit pour la gouvernance de la smart city ?Cadre de la recherche : Le projet GOV du portefeuille de projet FEDER Wal-e CitiesWal-e-Cities vise dvelopper les villes intelligentes dans le contexte spcifique de la Wallonie.Le porte feuille de projet a pour objectif de crer des solutions IoT innovantes axes sur les citoyens dans les domaines de la mobilit, de l'efficacit nergtique, de la gouvernance et du bien-tre.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.328
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it