← Back to cohort
A search for dark matter produced in association with a dark Higgs boson decaying into a Higgs boson pair in 3b or 4b final states using pp collisions at SQUARE ROOTs = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector
G. Aad, E. Aakvaag, B. Abbott, K. Abeling, N. J. Abicht, S. H. Abidi, A. Aboulhorma, H. Abramowicz, H. Abreu, Y. Abulaiti, Petr Baroň, Peter Berta, Marek Biroš, Chainika Chauhan, Tomáš Davídek, Martin Divíšek, Zdeněk Doležal, Jana Faltová, Pavol Federič, Matej Haviernik, Nihad Hidic, Yicong Huang, Samuel Jankových, Peter Kodyš, Rupert Leitner, Gabriela Karkošová Martinovicová, Jan Matoušek, Michaela Mlynáriková, Agnieszka Ewa Ogrodnik, Franciszek Jerzy Monique Pauwels, Tadeáš Petrů, Vojtěch Pleskot, Stanislav Poláček, Pavel Řezníček, Martin Rybář, Daniel Scheirich, Martin Spousta, Martin Sýkora, Tomáš Sýkora, Petr Tas, Denys Timoshyn, Sarka Todorova, Pavel Vana
Bibliographic record
VenueCU Research Publications Repository · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCHIST-ERAAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónAgencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y TecnológicaFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceUniversity of California, IrvineH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie ActionsUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesStony Brook UniversityMinistero dell'Università e della RicercaAgencia Nacional de Investigación y DesarrolloUniversity of West AtticaNarodowa Agencja Wymiany AkademickiejJulius-Maximilians-Universität WürzburgForskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och VälfärdUniversity of TsukubaAristotle University of ThessalonikiEuropean Social FundRoyal SocietyCentre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et TechniqueEuropean Regional Development FundBritish Columbia Knowledge Development FundMax-Planck-GesellschaftCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueMinisterstwo Edukacji i NaukiConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoBundesministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und WirtschaftUniversity of TorontoGeneralitat ValencianaGeneralitat de CatalunyaU.S. Department of EnergyCarl Tryggers Stiftelse för Vetenskaplig ForskningGrantová Agentura České RepublikyAustrian Science FundAcademia SinicaWaseda UniversityTel Aviv UniversityNational Science and Technology CouncilMinisterstvo Školství, Mládeže a TělovýchovyHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeVetenskapsrådetNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaEuropean CommissionLeverhulme TrustFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloScience and Technology Facilities CouncilYork UniversitySchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekMinistry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of ChinaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyDivision of PhysicsAgence Nationale de la RechercheH2020 European Research CouncilNorges ForskningsrådKungliga Tekniska HögskolanAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungHigh Energy PhysicsTRIUMFUniversity of WarwickBaden-Württemberg StiftungUniversity of SussexNational Science FoundationIstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareUK Research and InnovationDanmarks GrundforskningsfondTürkiye Enerji, Nükleer ve Maden Araştırma KurumuCanarieTokyo Metropolitan UniversityTechnion-Israel Institute of TechnologyCERNCentres de Recerca de CatalunyaMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación
KeywordsHiggs bosonDark matterBosonStandard Model (mathematical formulation)Square (algebra)Elementary particleParticle decay
DOInot available
Abstract
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.870
Threshold uncertainty score0.936
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".
Quick stats
Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno