MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133459191

New Saurolophine Material from the Upper Campanian-Lower Maastrichtian Wapiti Formation, West-Central Alberta

2014· other· en· W7133459191 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Phil R Bell, Robin Sissons, Michael Creighton Burns, Federico Fanti, Philip J Currie

Bibliographic record

VenueRUNE (Research UNE) · 2014
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPostcraniaCretaceousWillowCarboniferousSkull
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A saurolophine hadrosaurid from the Upper Cretaceous Wapiti Formation of west-central Alberta is described on the basis of an incomplete skull, which was found in association with a partial postcranial skeleton. The new specimen comprises the first semi-complete cranial material of a hadrosaur from the Wapiti Formation, and includes the right prefrontal, left maxilla, both jugals, right quadratojugal, left quadrate, left dentary, and ?left angular. The skull has similarities to those of similar-sized individuals of 'Edmontosaurus'; however, the short dentary diastema in the Wapiti saurolophine is unlike that of 'Edmontosaurus'. Histological analysis indicates the individual was likely a subadult. The new skeleton comes from the Red Willow Coal Zone at the top of Unit 4 of the Wapiti Formation, placing it on or close to the Campanian-Maastrichtian boundary. A phylogenetic analysis recovers the Wapiti hadrosaur in a polytomy with other saurolophines. Although it could not be assigned to a particular genus, the new specimen underscores the potential of this formation to fill gaps in the terrestrial fossil record of southern Alberta.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.153
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1390.095

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRUNE (Research UNE)French-language works237,207