MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133463314

Elaboration of a canned uvita fruit wine in the municipality of San Alberto, Cesar

2021· article· es· W7133463314 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kevin Guevara Sánchez, Yuri Dayana Laiton Hernández

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversidad Industrial de Santander · 2021
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotanical Research and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWineElaborationQuarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En este proyecto se logró la elaboración de un vino de frutas a base de uvita de lata (bactris minor). La cual es una planta perteneciente a la familia palmácea, se da en la costa caribe, generalmente en terrenos cenagosos y con problemas de drenajes. Durante cuatro años se realizaron estudios exploratorios en el municipio de san Alberto- cesar, con el fin de establecer parámetros para proceso de elaboración del vino de frutas de uvita de lata. Para ello se tuvieron en cuenta algunas variables como tiempo de fermentación, macerado y cantidad de azúcar. El proceso de elaboración del vino de frutas de uvita de lata consiste en lavar los frutos, desinfectarlos y macerarlos para luego agregar el azúcar en la cantidad adecuada y poner el mosto en fermentación por un tiempo determinado de 10 meses para lograr un producto con las características organolépticas adecuadas. Además, se realizaron análisis microbiológicos y fisicoquímicos al producto terminado, y por los resultados obtenidos se concluyó que este producto cumple con los parámetros legales vigentes y por lo tanto es apto para el consumo humano, adicionalmente se realizaron unas pruebas sensoriales y de aceptación, por los resultados obtenidos se concluye que el producto es bastante aceptable y que es muy agradable al paladar 1 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.609
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversidad Industrial de SantanderSame topicBotanical Research and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207