← Back to cohort
Measurement of the ratio B(B0s --> J/ψf0(980))/B(B0s --> J/ψφ(1020)) in pp collisions at sqrt(s)=7 TeV
Evelyne Daubie, Nikita Beliy, Thierry Caebergs, Grégory Hammad, Catherine Vander Velde, CMS Collaboration
Bibliographic record
VenueORBi UMONS · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
FundersEuropean Social FundInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesFonds pour la Formation à la Recherche dans l’Industrie et dans l’AgricultureScience and Technology Facilities CouncilQatar National Research FundNational Institutes of HealthEuropean Regional Development FundCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueU.S. Department of EnergyFundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de JaneiroMinistry of Education, IndiaTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma KurumuNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Science and Technology Development AgencyA.G. Leventis FoundationTürkiye Atom Enerjisi KurumuJoint Institute for Nuclear ResearchFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRSConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekMinistry of Science, ICT and Future PlanningHungarian Scientific Research FundGeneral Secretariat for Research and TechnologyBundesministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und WirtschaftBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadAgentschap voor Innovatie door Wetenschap en TechnologieCompagnia di San PaoloAustrian Science FundMinisterstvo Školství, Mládeže a TělovýchovyEuropean CommissionFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorRussian Foundation for Basic ResearchFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaUniversidad Autónoma de San Luis PotosíBelgian Federal Science Policy OfficeNational Science FoundationScience Foundation IrelandInstitute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and TechnologyNational Academy of Sciences of UkraineFundacja na rzecz Nauki PolskiejDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftDepartamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (COLCIENCIAS)Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico NacionalCERNAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y TecnologíaState Fund for Fundamental Research of UkraineNational Science CouncilPakistan Atomic Energy CommissionFonds National de la Recherche LuxembourgMinistero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della RicercaSecretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e InnovaciónAlfred P. Sloan Foundation
KeywordsMeasure (data warehouse)Field (mathematics)Limit (mathematics)Range (aeronautics)Branching fraction
DOInot available
Abstract
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.356
Threshold uncertainty score0.383
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".
Quick stats
Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractno