MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A DenseNet-Based Deep Learning Approach for Accurate Classification and Interpretability in the Diagnosis of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

2025· article· W7133487516 on OpenAlexaff
Ragini Y P, Ola Khresat, B.Mamatha, H V Asha

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Imaging for Blood Diseases
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterpretabilityDeep learningLymphoblastic LeukemiaAcute lymphocytic leukemiaFeature (linguistics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) is a life- threatening hematologic malignancy and requires precise and early diagnosis. In this work we introduce a deep learning model, based on DenseNets, to fully automate the classification and interpretation of all microscopic images of blood smears of ALL. The densely connected nature of DenseNet boosts gradient flow and feature reuse, providing the solid framework of images-based medical diagnosis. The data that is used in the given study is a balanced dataset due to a fair amount of normal and abnormal white blood cell (WBC) images as can be observed through the class distribution plot. Exploratory data analysis consisting of pixel intensity histograms, dimensionality reduction through PCA and t-SNE showed that the distributions of normal and the leukemic cells can be distinguished by their clustering patterns before the model training. It is seen that there exists a discriminative power in the extracted features. The suggested model had a quick convergence with the training and validation sets of 20 epochs. The training and validation accuracies were stabilized at the values of about 98.5 percent and 98, respectively. Loss values in correspondence also showed a steep decrease, which showed that over fitting had a least extent. The confusion matrix ensures the best classification results of test set with accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score of 100%, and zero false positive of negative. Also, PCA and t-SNE visualizations prove the ability of the model to draw clear boundaries between different classes. The transparency of predictions can also be seen through the distributions of feature spaces and this allows clinical transparency. Conclusively, the model constructed using DenseNet performed at an impressive level in monitoring ALL through the blood smear pictures, and serves as an encouraging method in assisting the hematologists in their early diagnosis. Future directions can include (1) integration with explanations methods of AI, and (2) testing on multi- center data to check the robustness and generalizability of the method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.895
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDigital Imaging for Blood DiseasesFrench-language works237,207