MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Ultra-Low-Power Wearable ECG Model with Cost-Effective Wireless Sensing System Through Convolutional Neural Network

2025· article· W7133490114 on OpenAlexaff
V. Lavanya, Hayel Khafajeh, Gonigunta Siva Prasad, J Shubangi, Rakesh Chandrashekar, M. Dinesh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicECG Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvolutional neural networkArtificial neural networkWearable computerWirelessKey (lock)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research is being conducted on an Ultra-Low-Power Wearable ECG Model with Cost-Effective Wireless Sensing System Through Convolutional Neural Network (UWECWC) for applications in health monitoring, structural assessment, and environmental sensing. A deep learning framework has been designed to detect epileptic seizures by processing Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) and Electroencephalogram (EEG) data through convolutional neural networks (CNNs), using sliding window techniques to enhance classification while optimizing computational resources and reducing artifacts. A low-power wearable Electrocardiogram (ECG) model enables real-time detection of cardiac arrhythmias during physical activity, featuring energy harvesting via solar panels and a compact electronic design that promotes communication and power management. A wireless sensing system designed for ultra-high-performance concrete uses a two-probe resistance measurement technique along with low-power management features to enable continuous and energy-efficient monitoring. The following parameters are calculated for UWECWC is sensitivity and specificity calculation, power consumption, accuracy calculation, amplitude calculation, and sensitivity & AUC calculation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicECG Monitoring and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207