MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7133505828 · doi:10.48336/290

Wedding dresses near me

2025· other· en· W7133505828 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Amanda Marie Hull

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFace (sociological concept)Shadow (psychology)PortraitFalling in loveMasculinityPoliticsFalling (accident)Subconscious

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lydia is used to being in control. And now her universe is falling apart. In the shadow of climate change, her hometown's resettlement, and a devastating diagnosis, she decides to throw one last, defiant party. As she plans an extravagant wedding on a tiny island in the North Atlantic off the coast of Newfoundland, she faces not just logistical hiccups, but mortality, entropy, and the ruins of perfectionism in a world gone mad. Forced to reflect on the relationships and experiences that have shaped her, she must navigate the unglamorous mechanics of caretaking, the disorientation of hope, the politics of female embodiment, and what it means to be tethered to an uncertain future. Wedding Dresses Near Me is a love story and an elegy. It's a tale about the strange and stubborn ways people care for one another in the face of chaos and a collapsing sense of permanence. An exploration of home, identity, loss, and reclaimed joy, this novel is a portrait of intimacy under pressure, told with humour, philosophical weight, and aching emotional precision. Lydia must answer a question: Can she learn to love her life, not because it's perfect, but in spite of the fact that it's not?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.746
Threshold uncertainty score0.848

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0080.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2540.053

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→French-language works237,207→