MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A Symmetric Bipolar Isolated Combined Cuk-SEPIC Converter Using Single Switch

2025· article· W7133507162 on OpenAlexaff
Gustavo Orue, Hafiz Furqan Ahmed, Mohsin Jamil

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPower (physics)VoltageNoise (video)Topology (electrical circuits)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work presents a newly developed isolated symmetric bipolar DC-DC topology with an adjustable high voltage gain that can be regulated through independent parameters. The proposed topology delivers equal-magnitude positive and negative output voltages referenced to a common ground, based on the combination of the typical characteristics found in the Single-Ended Primary-Inductor Converter (SEPIC) and the inverting output seen on the Ćuk converter that operates with a single active switch. The design features two key control parameters: the transformer turns ratio and the switching duty cycle, providing flexible voltage gain control. A turns ratio of one enables a wide buck-boost voltage range, while increasing the ratio facilitates integration with low-voltage renewable sources connected to bipolar DC grids. The proposed converter maintains a continuous input current with minimized ripple, making it highly appropriate for integration with renewable energy sources and energy storage systems. Its performance is substantiated through both theoretical modeling and simulation evaluation, using a model designed to operate in continuous conduction mode (CCM).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced DC-DC Converters→French-language works237,207→