MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Novel Control of Unified Power Flow Controller Using Modified Invasive Weed Optimization based PI Controllers

2025· article· W7133515890 on OpenAlexaff
G Tulasichandra Sekhar, K. G. Srinivasan, Ch. Lokeshwar Reddy, K Saneep, Pareshwar Prasad, U. Esakkiammal, Patil Mounica, Ajay Sudhir Bale, Kandi Bhanu Prakash

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Controller (irrigation)Power (physics)Control systemControl (management)Power flow

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electrical transmission system especially AC system is commonly established in many countries to transmit electric power from one location to another location efficiently. In order to make AC transmission system efficiently to transmit more power at rated voltage, FACTS devices are commonly employed at various locations. Among many, UPFC device is frequently employed to make better power flow in the transmission system. This UPFC is facilitated between generating unit and distribution system. Two converters are linked with a common dc-link to establish an UPFC device and proper control methodology will be implemented to make an efficient power flow from generation to distribution point. A novel control methodology must be incorporate to achieve an effective operation under various operating conditions. Proposed control methodology utilized various PI controllers and generally conventional PI controllers may suffer from constant gains. Hence, MIWO is developed to update gains of various PI controllers utilized in the proposed control method. Results in terms of convergence are compared among proposed MIWO with existing GWO and ACO methods. MATLAB/Simulink platform is used to simulate the proposed methodology and presented various results under different operating conditions. Comprehensive responses are included in the results section, accompanied by thorough analysis across multiple case studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207