MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Geothermal-Based and Grid-Connected Energy Optimization of Smart Greenhouse Using Energy Valley Optimizer: A Case Study in Regina, Canada

2025· article· W7133522051 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mohammad Ghiasi, Zhanle Wang, Mehran Mehrandezh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGreenhouse Technology and Climate Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnergy (signal processing)GreenhouseEnergy consumptionRenewable energyGreenhouse gasEfficient energy use

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The energy-efficient operation of Greenhouses (GH) is critical for sustainable agriculture, especially in cold regions. In this regard, this paper proposes a novel optimization framework for meeting GH energy requirements by integrating geothermal energy systems with the conventional electrical network. In this methodology, we apply particle swarm optimization-based technique on the testing platform Energy Valley Optimizer (EVO), which aims to reduce energy expenditures while ensuring thermal comfort of the occupants and operational constraints are adhered to. The mentioned framework combines dynamic thermal and solar radiation measurements along with GH's thermophysical properties to evaluate the heating, cooling, ventilation, lighting, and CO<inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</inf> enrichment for a 24-hour period. Operational constraints like uncoordinated heating and cooling, adherence to lighting schedules, etc. are incorporated as penalty terms. For representative analysis, a four-day period was selected, which includes 1st of January, 1st of April, 1st of July and 1st of October, based on the weather conditions of Regina city and accounting for the seasonal variation. The results achieved show that the optimization framework is capable of balancing the contribution of renewable energy (RE) and the grid in a cost-effective way and that the indoor temperature remains within the desired setpoints. This study highlights the importance of optimization algorithms and their integration into GH energy management, leading to greener and more costeffective agricultural practices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.363
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGreenhouse Technology and Climate ControlFrench-language works237,207