MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Grey Wolf Optimization based MPPT of PV System Powered Water Pumping System Driven by SRM under Partial Shading Conditions

2025· article· W7133524661 on OpenAlexaff
Cholleti Harish, P. Loganathan, G Sudha, K. Trinadh Babu, Sumit Pundir, S. Kanmani Jebaseeli, Krishna Chaithanya Janapati, Ajay Sudhir Bale Senior, Kandi Bhanu Prakash

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnergy
TopicPhotovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotovoltaic systemWater pumpingMaximum power point trackingControl theory (sociology)Shading

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The WPS plays a crucial role in various daily human activities, including agriculture, drinking water supply, and industrial applications. In particular, the agricultural sector is heavily dependent on WPS, as it serves as the main source of irrigation for crops. To reduce the strain on the electrical grid and ensure a consistent power supply for WPS in rural areas, a standalone PV powered WPS installed locally offers a practical solution. An electrical motor is essential for operating the pump, which draws water from underground sources to irrigate fields. Among the different types of motors available, SRMs have attracted considerable attention from researchers for their potential use in WPS due to their many benefits. This paper examines an 8/6 pole SRM designed to deliver the maximum torque required to lift water from significant depths. However, incorporating batteries into WPS systems can result in higher costs and increased maintenance, which may be a barrier for farmers. Therefore, this study emphasizes a PVpowered SRM based WPS that functions without batteries, utilizing a speed sensorless DTC in conjunction with a SMC. The GWO based P&O algorithm is employed and integrated with a dc-link voltage controller to optimize power extraction from the PV system even operating efficiently during PSCs by managing the proposed converter. As a result, an additional DC-DC converter for MPPT is rendered unnecessary. Detailed results from HIL testing are presented to validate the proposed system’s performance under both transient and steady-state conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhotovoltaic System Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207