MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Performance of Fast Electric Vehicle Charging Stations by Energy Storage Devices based Grid Connected Hybrid Renewable Energy Sources

2025· article· W7133554616 on OpenAlexaff
N. Kiran, Shannmukha Naga Raju Vonteddu, Ajay Babu Bathula, Srinivasa Rao Burri, Vipashi Kansal, S. Senthil Kumar, B. Rajagopal Reddy, Ajay Sudhir Bale, Siva Ganesh Malla

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenewable energyElectric vehicleGridEnergy storageEnergy (signal processing)Charging station

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electric Vehicles (EVs) are becoming a trending concept in present research fields. Many kinds of EVs are developed worldwide and are running successfully on roads. Hence, charging stations must be established at many places and also highly required to improve their performance as well as maintenance. An efficient as well as fast charging station is proposed in this paper where powered by grid connected hybrid renewable energy sources. A detailed mathematical analysis is compressed to make this work more effective. Loads at different locations across the south India is considered while developing the proposed method. Considering the availability of energy resources in those regions, their dynamism, and techno-economic feasibility, a hybrid grid-connected renewable energy system, complete with a battery storage unit and power conversion module, has been designed for the proposed charging stations. These sites/places are also connected to ecofriendly EV charging stations, which come with various incentives. The optimization results indicate that after incorporating on-grid hybrid renewable energy resources, there is a significant reduction in key performance metrics. Specifically, the Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) has decreased by 87.50%, and the Net Present Cost (NPC) has dropped by 95.26%. This translates to a reduction in LCOE from ${\$}$ 0. 0 3 3 8 4 per kWh to ${\$}$ 0. 0 0 4 0 7 per kWh, and a decrease in NPC from ${\$}$0.09172 to ${\$}$0.00435 million, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureFrench-language works237,207