MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133782040 · doi:10.46254/au04.20250063

System Dynamics Modeling of Employee Turnover Among Canadian Nursing Home Workers

2025· article· W7133782040 on OpenAlexaffabout
Hannah J Wong, Tamara Daly

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicComplex Systems and Decision Making
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNursing homesTurnoverSystem dynamicsDynamics (music)Turnover intention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canada had one of the highest Covid-19 death rates worldwide in individuals living in nursing homes (NHs). In response, the province of Ontario with the largest population in Canada passed “The Fixing Long-Term Care Act” in 2021 to address long-standing issues in long-term care NHs. These issues include chronic underfunding, understaffing and poor working conditions that were compounded by increasing resident care needs. As a result, changes were made that included mandatory minimum hours of direct nursing and personal support worker (PSW) care, increased fines for NHs failing to meet standards, and an emphasis on resident rights for holistic care. Despite the Act’s passage, problems retaining and recruiting PSWs make achieving the Act’s commitments difficult. PSWs provide more than 80% of direct care to NH residents in Canada, helping with activities of daily living and providing emotional support and companionship. In Ontario, half of the PSW workforce leave the healthcare sector within 5 years and 43% left due to burnout. High PSW turnover disrupts care continuity and is associated with poorer quality of care and quality of life for residents. Contributing factors to PSW burnout include heavy workloads, systemic disrespect and underappreciation, and feelings of professional inefficacy. The Covid-19 epidemic further exposed the unaddressed need for a systemic approach to the long-standing issues that prevent better resident care and outcomes. The objective of this study was to develop a system dynamics (SD) model that could be used to help design more successful workforce-related policies to reduce PSW turnover and improve overall quality of care in NHs. We developed an SD model of PSW turnover consisting of four sectors: 1. The ministry-level sector that models the government’s policies for direct hours of care, funding, care standards, compliance and enforcement. 2. The management-level sector that models organizational workplace culture and policies for PSW scheduling, backfilling, hiring, on-the-job training and upskilling. 3. The resident-family sector that tracks the flow of residents, their care needs, and family perceptions and expectations of care delivery. 4. The PSW responses sector that models the ways PSWs deal with challenging working conditions. We used causal loop diagrams to describe the complex feedback processes that lead to PSW turnover. One such process explores staff shortages leading to overwork/fatigue exacerbated by increasing resident complexity, productivity and quality declines from hiring new PSWs and employing temporary relief workers, and pervasive disrespect for the PSW profession that locks PSWs into a vicious cycle of “learned helplessness”. Publicly reported NH data and those from the literature, PSW experiences extracted from group model building exercises, and historical home-specific data were used to build and calibrate the model for 4 NHs in Toronto, Ontario. The model is generalizable to an individual NH within and across provinces due to the similar working conditions in Canadian NHs. We discuss the results of several simulations that might reduce PSW turnover and improve care quality and their implications for governmental legislative changes and NH organizational practices and policies. We close with recommendations for policy design to reduce PSW turnover.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.161
Threshold uncertainty score0.324

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicComplex Systems and Decision MakingFrench-language works237,207