MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7133839618 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18879084

Ecosystem Metabolism of the Metalimnion in Lake Superior using AUG data

2025· other· en· W7133839618 on OpenAlexaff
Panditha Vidana Sasindu Lakmini Gunawardana

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsTrent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpilimnionThermoclineEcosystemPrimary productionDiel vertical migrationHypolimnionEcosystem respirationAcartia tonsa

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We estimated depth-specific ecosystem metabolism in the metalimnion of Lake Superior using high-resolution dissolved oxygen and temperature data collected during 15 autonomous underwater glider (AUG) missions conducted between 2014 and 2021. The provided R code documents the complete workflow for (1) identifying epilimnion and metalimnion boundaries from temperature profiles (using inflection points in the second derivative of temperature with depth), (2) subdividing the metalimnion into shallow, mid, and deep layers, (3) calculating gross primary production (GPP), ecosystem respiration (ER), and net ecosystem production (NEP) using the diel oxygen change method, and (4) performing post hoc statistical analyses (including generalized additive mixed models [GAMMs] to examine drivers such as temperature, relative thermal resistance to mixing [RTRM], and offshore distance). The code includes data preprocessing, boundary detection functions, metabolism calculations, model fitting, visualization of thermal performance curves and interactions, and summary statistics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.860
Threshold uncertainty score0.278

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→French-language works237,207→