MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133846225 · doi:10.7202/1123529ar

Le politique partout : expériences immigrantes dans le milieu communautaire à Montréal

2025· article· fr· W7133846225 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Eduardo González Castillo, Frederico Fagundes Soares

Bibliographic record

VenueReflets Revue d’intervention sociale et communautaire · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)PoliticsPopulationPower (physics)State (computer science)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article présente une étude qualitative des expériences d’individus issus des pays du Sud global occupant des postes à responsabilité au sein d’organismes communautaires oeuvrant dans des quartiers défavorisés de Montréal, Québec. L’analyse souligne la dimension politique des expériences à l’étude tout en les situant dans le processus de formation de ce qu’Antonio Gramsci appelle l’État intégral. L’étude remet en question l’étiquette de passivité qui est souvent apposée sur la population issue de l’immigration et met en évidence la complexité liée à leur participation dans le milieu analysé. Les conclusions pointent vers une participation importante de ces populations, malgré des défis tels que le racisme systémique, les rapports de pouvoir à l’échelle locale et les jeux d’intérêts entre organismes dans un contexte caractérisé par la concurrence pour le financement de l’État.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.216

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0190.014
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReflets Revue d’intervention sociale et communautaireSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207