Zum Einfluss des Nationalsozialismus auf das kirchliche Leben der evangelischen Sorben in der niederschlesischen Oberlausitz. Aus Berichten über die Kirchengemeinden Hoyerswerda, Lohsa und Schleife
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Influence of National Socialism on the Religious Life of the Lutheran Sorbs in the Lower Silesian part of Upper Lusatia. From Reports on the Parishes of Hoyerswerda, Lohsa and Schleife At the beginning of the 1920s there were 17 parishes in the Lutheran Consistory of Silesia, in which Sorbian was used in services. The growing lack of Sorbian probationary candidates for the clergy became a great problem from the middle of the 1920s. As a result, the Lutheran Consistory in Breslau provided financial subsidies for Sorbian language courses and grants to students of theology. This continuing financial support for the future generation of Sorbian clergy and for Sorbian parishes was initially maintained, even after 1933. The language policy of the Church authorities changed in 1938, when Sorbian candidates for the ministry were no longer appointed to posts in bilingual parishes. The Sorbian graduates, of whom there were only a few, were placed in other areas of the Church Province of Silesia. In addition, there was conflict with supporters of the Confessional Church. This ultimately led to the transfer of two Sorbian pastors. Pastors Jurij Malink (Ger. Georg Mahling) in Lohsa and Gottfried Rejsler (Gottfried Rösler) in Schleife were removed from their Sorbian parishes in 1938.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".