MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Concept of Neonaticide in Russian Criminal Law and International Legal Systems

2025· article· W7133939133 on OpenAlexaff
Aleksandr V. Kulikov, Olga A. Sheleg

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational criminal law and international justice · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Canadian institutionsInnovation Cluster (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCriminal lawInstitutionCriticismCriminal codeDoctrinePhenomenonCriminal procedure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

At the present stage, the phenomenon of “neonaticide” is not given due attention in the doctrine of criminal law. The study of this institution is mainly reduced to criticism of Article 106 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, when a mother commits murder of her newborn child. Difficulties arise in the application of the criminal law, incorrect qualification of the crime. The authors summarize the points of view, conduct a comparative legal analysis of the development of the institution of neonaticide, both in foreign countries and in Russia, express their opinion on this concept and proposals for improving criminal law norms

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.949
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational criminal law and international justiceSame topicHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseFrench-language works237,207