MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7134074038 · doi:10.52783/tangence.67

Edge Computing for Smart Grid: An Overview

2025· article· W7134074038 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Prajali Bafila

Bibliographic record

VenueTangence · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloud computingEdge computingServerKey (lock)Smart gridEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionGridBandwidth (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Edge computing has a big impact on smart grids. It cuts down on delays by handling data near where it comes from. This lets grids make choices immedi- ately, which is key for quick and reliable operations. It’s different from old cloud systems, where data goes to main servers for checking. This new way speeds up data work, makes things safer, uses bandwidth better, and helps the system bounce back from problems. Edge computing cuts down on hold-ups from busy networks and doesn’t need always to be online. It makes grid jobs like finding faults, answering demand, and guessing loads faster and more exact. This paper looks at how edge computing stacks up against cloud computing for smart grids. It checks how this affects how well the grid works overall. The findings show that edge-based setups help modern power networks to adapt and recover. This means they can better handle the spread of energy sources and changing energy needs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.904
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTangenceSame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207