MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7134102110

From Deep Learning to Deep Consciousness:Predicting Comatose Patient Outcomes with Time-Series CT Scans

2025· other· en· W7134102110 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sumit Pandey

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeep learningAnticipation (artificial intelligence)SegmentationProcess (computing)UnavailabilityMedical imagingTimeline
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this thesis was to predict the outcome of patients based on time series CT scans using Deep Learning techniques. Previous studies that have attempted to predict patient outcomes using only CT or MRI scans have largely been unsuccessful. In contrast, this study presented a novel approach by incorporating the temporal dimension of CT scans, thereby potentially capturing dynamic changes that may be critical to predicting outcomes. Over the first two years of this study, acquiring and hosting the dataset from Copenhagen University Hospital in Denmark presented considerable hurdles. Complying with GDPR rules, ethical guidelines, and data management clearances alone required nearly eight months. After obtaining approval, we initially intended to store the data on the DTU server, which adhered to GDPR standards. However, we were only informed after several months that GPU support for sensitive data had been discontinued on that server. This prompted us to revise our data management strategy and migrate the dataset to the High-Performance Computing (HPC) server of the Clinically Applied Artificial Intelligence (CAAI) Center. This process ultimately occupied the PhD’s first two years. In the interim, multiple methodological approaches were explored and developed in anticipation of receiving the dataset, ensuring that we were fully prepared once it became available. To address the initial unavailability of data, we divided the PhD timeline into two phases: Pre-Deep Consciousness and Deep Consciousness. The Pre-Deep Consciousness phase included a series of scientific experiments aimed at developing a robust deep learning segmentation approach. Our strategy involved extracting latent space representations from the images and training time series models (LSTM model and transformer model) on these features to predict outcomes for coma patients. The first step of our Pre-Deep Consciousness plan was to validate our hypothesis by developing a synthetic dataset that mimics the time series nature of CT scans. This synthetic dataset included both images and corresponding masks. We trained a U-Net model on these synthetic images and masks, which allowed us to explore two different approaches. In the first approach, we extracted the latent space from the encoder of the U-Net and fed it into a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network to predict patient outcomes. In the second approach, we extracted radiomics features from the images and used them as input for an LSTM model. Using the synthetic dataset, we achieved promising results with an AUC of approximately 0.92; however, this was based on thousands of generated images. To evaluate the performance of our methods on a smaller, real-world dataset, we also applied these approaches to the Brats-18 dataset. Unlike our synthetic dataset, Brats-18 contains only a single 3D MRI image per patient, rather than a series of scans. On this dataset, survival prediction yielded an AUC of about 0.55, highlighting the challenges of applying our methods to limited data. After concluding experiments on the synthetic and BraTS-18 datasets, our data acquisition process was still ongoing. We began investigating robust segmentation methods using a small dataset. Because we anticipated that, due to time constraints, we would only be able to create masks for fewer than 50 head CT images, we planned to use latent representations for further analysis. Building on their promising performance, we experimented with various versions of Multi-Planar UNet, the Segment Anything Model (SAM), and You Only Look Once (YOLO). For simplicity, we began with 2D images, focusing on segmenting the short-axis abdominal aorta in POCUS (Point-of-Care Ultrasound) images. With only 500 training samples, YOLOv8 segmented nearly every image, including noisy POCUS scans sourced online. We further experimented by training YOLO on just 100 samples (images and masks) and passing the resulting bounding boxes to SAM as prompts, leading to masks noticeably superior to those produced by YOLO alone—suggesting that SAM’s encoder might provide a useful latent space for our project. After concluding this phase, we searched for a place to host the Deep Consciousness dataset and explored another segmentation method: Multi-Planar UNet (MPU). This model excels at handling small, complex datasets (fewer than 100 samples), such as knee MRI scans, and when we added an attention mechanism, MPU’s Dice Score improved by about 2%. Meanwhile, during our YOLO experiments, we uncovered two major obstacles to its application in medical imaging: a complex training data structure and a lack of medical-specific pre-trained weights. In response, we open-sourced three critical resources—a Python package that simplifies training 2D and 3D images with YOLO, “Med-YOLO” pre-trained weights, and a COCO-style medical dataset containing roughly 200,000 2D CT scans and around 4.5 million bounding boxes—to help make medical imaging research more accessible and efficient. In the midst of the MED-YOLO project, we acquired our dataset and launched the Deep Consciousness project, which was divided into two stages. The preliminary assessment stage involved only 33% of patients for whom survival labels were available, focusing on those with more than three CT scans to capture temporal effects. In the final assessment stage, after we obtained all labels for all patients, we included individuals with even a single CT scan, building on the preliminary findings. The first step of this project was bias analysis and preprocessing. We checked for correlations between the number of CT scans per patient and, finding none, proceeded to generate brain masks using TotalSegmentator. Next, we calculated mask volumes to exclude cases lacking head CT information, ensuring that remaining scans were within 1,000 to 2,000 cc in size. Once these scans were identified, they were registered to the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) head CT, and SAM MED-3D was employed to extract latent space representations. Two deep learning models: Transformer based model and a Conv-LSTM model were trained on the time-series latent representations, achieving AUROCs of 0.7 and 0.65, respectively, in 5-fold cross-validation on the validation dataset.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)→French-language works237,207→