MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7134113800 · doi:10.60918/23523

Suivi du portrait des repas surgelés disponibles au Québec 2018-2023

2024· report· W7134113800 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dylan Guillemette, Julie Perron, Sonia Pomerleau, Clara-Jane Rhéaume, Véronique Provencher

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2024
Typereport
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPortraitComposition (language)Older peopleNursing homes

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ces résultats montrent certains changements dans la composition nutritionnelle des repas surgelés offerts et vendus en 2023 par rapport à 2018. Les teneurs en énergie, en lipides, en protéines et en sodium ont augmenté de manière significative dans les repas offerts. Une plus faible proportion de repas respecte les seuils de 30 % de la VQ pour le sodium et les gras saturés en 2023 comparativement à 2018. Par ailleurs, les repas modifiés ont connu une détérioration de leur composition nutritionnelle. Si aucun changement n’est apporté, la majorité des repas surgelés disponibles au Québec aurait à afficher le symbole nutritionnel sur le devant de leur emballage en raison de leur contenu élevé en sodium, en gras saturés et/ou en sucres. De réels efforts devront être déployés afin d’améliorer la composition nutritionnelle des repas surgelés offerts et vendus au Québec dans les années à venir.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.103

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→French-language works237,207→