MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7134116023 · doi:10.3169/itej.77.597

11. The Past and Future of the Artificial Intelligence Art and Aesthetics Research Group

2023· article· en· W7134116023 on OpenAlexaff
Hideki Nakazawa, Mika Kusakari

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of The Institute of Image Information and Television Engineers · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt, Technology, and Culture
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGroup (periodic table)Media arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

形態) の 対比をそこに重ねていたため,ついに AI が哲学や芸術の 原理レベルで人智を超えたと考えた.そして,囲碁による 作品を過去に発表していたことから,この機に美術家とし て反応する必要を痛感した. 美術家の草刈ミカは, 「恍惚点描画」 や,絵の具のチュー ブで 「線」 を引いて積層する 「凹凸絵画」 シリーズを展開し ていた.ある日突然,草刈のメールアドレス宛に

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.116

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0130.008
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0060.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of The Institute of Image Information and Television EngineersSame topicArt, Technology, and CultureFrench-language works237,207