Lithofacies and Sedimentology of Baghanwala Formation (Early-Middle Cambrian), Eastern Salt Range, Pakistan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A detailed sedimentological study of the Baghanwala formation from, the Sikkiwala Kas (58.5m) and the Choa Saidan Shah-Khewra section (30 m) in the eastern salt range was carried out, six lithofacies were identified: sandstone interlaminated with mudstone (LF1), medium to coarse-grained sandstone (LF2), fine-grained sandstone interbedded with mudstone (LF3), medium grained sandstone with flaser, wavy and lenticular bedding (LF4), sandstone intercalated with siltstone and mudstone with salt pseudomorph (LF5) and mudstone with sandstone intercalations (LF6). A variety of sedimentary structures has been recorded. These include salt pseudomorph, ripple marks, trace fossils, mud cracks, lenticular, wavy and flaser bedding. The sandstone facies are composed of thin, channelised bedding which were mainly deposited in shallow marine The remaining part exhibits relatively higher porosity as evidenced by the study of thin sections. Therefore, LF2 and LF3 of the Baghanwala formation have the potential to be considered as a candidate of reservoir quality based on petrography and well logs. This part appears to be a good reservoir and may be exploited for its hydrocarbon potential in the subsurface in the eastern Potwar.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".