Efficient Neural Architectures for Real-Time ECG Interpretation on Limited Hardware
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation is essential for diagnosing a wide range of cardiac abnormalities. While deep learning has shown strong potential for automating ECG classification, many existing models rely on large, computationally intensive architectures that hinder practical deployment. In this paper, we present an empirical study of convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures, exploring tradeoffs between diagnostic accuracy and computational efficiency. We benchmark two established baselines: AttiaNet, a compact model composed of sequential temporal and spatial blocks, and DeepResidualCNN, the winning architecture of the 2021 PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge. Building on these, we propose three lightweight models: (i) ParallelCNN, which employs dual temporal and spatial branches for parallel pattern extraction; (ii) ParallelCNNew, a variant with symmetric weight initialization for balanced feature learning; and (iii) SimpleNet, a streamlined architecture that jointly processes temporal and spatial dimensions. Our experiments span three publicly available 12-lead ECG datasets from Germany, China, and the United States, covering binary, multiclass, and multilabel classification tasks across diverse patient populations. We further evaluate the impact of integrating low-cost demographic metadata (age and sex) to improve performance with minimal overhead. To ensure fair comparison, we introduce a unified Efficiency Score that integrates model size, inference speed, memory usage, and AUC performance. By balancing diagnostic performance and efficiency, our models offer a scalable and viable foundation for next-generation AI systems in cardiovascular care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".