EKSPLORASI KEARIFAN LOKAL MELALUI TEKS NARATIF: STUDI RITUAL TEKES MASYARAKAT SUKU LAMASI DALAM PEMBELAJARAN BAHASA INDONESIA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to explore the local wisdom values contained in the Tekes traditional ritual of the Lamasi people in Insana District, North Central Timor Regency, and to explore its potential as a narrative text in Indonesian language learning. The research approach used is descriptive qualitative with narrative ethnography. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, participatory observation, documentation, and literature studies. The results show that the Tekes ritual is a form of respect for ancestors carried out through cultural symbols such as hauteas, nyiru, traditional cloth, betel nut, and sacrificial animals. Each symbol contains values such as religiosity, solidarity, respect for ancestors, and spiritual strength. The narrative structure of the Tekes procession includes elements of orientation, complication, resolution, and coda, which are in accordance with the basic competencies of narrative texts in the Indonesian language curriculum. The integration of Tekes as teaching material can strengthen student literacy while building cultural awareness and local identity. This study recommends the need for the development of local wisdom-based learning and cultural preservation by communities and educational institutions collaboratively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".