Narrativization of history in 18th century Franciscan chronicles and in the morlachian trilogy of Ivan Aralica
Bibliographic record
Abstract
S posebnim fokusom na naratološke strategije same povijesti koja se konstruira tek pripovijedanjem (H. White), te na fikcionalizaciju historije i historizaciju fikcije (P. Ricoeur), osobita se pozornost u ovom radu posvećuje interferencijama Araličinih novopovijesnih romana s franjevačkim kronikama na kompozicijskoj i fabularnoj razini, potom poveznicama u narativnoj i metanarativnoj strukturi, u stilskom oblikovanju, u načinima inkorporiranja elemenata iz folklorne tradicije (legendi i predaja), u opisima odnosa katolika i muslimana, u predodžbama osmanlijske i mletačke vlasti i sl. Umijeće pripovijedanja o povijesnim događajima prati se dakle u trima franjevačkim ljetopisima (Benićevu, Lašvaninovu i Bogdanovićevu) i trima Araličinim romanima: Put bez sna (1982), Duše robova (1984) i Graditelj svratišta (1986). Tom se korpusu u analizi književnoga modificiranja povijesti u Araličinoj morlačkoj trilogiji pridodaje putopis Alberta Fortisa Put po Dalmaciji (Viaggio in Dalmazia, 1774) u kojemu talijanski putopisac donosi opise svakodnevnog života i običaja Morlaka, tj. kontinentalnog stanovništva mletačke Dalmacije. Teorijska okosnica diplomskoga rada poglavito je vezana uz pojmove poput fikcionalizacije historije i historizacije fikcije, kulture sjećanja i figura sjećanja te intertekstualnosti i citatnosti.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".