MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7134366639

CRS issue brief

2003· report· en· W7134366639 on OpenAlexaff
Clyde R. Mark

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) · 2003
Typereport
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsGlobal Affairs Canada
Fundersnot available
Keywordsnot available
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The United States and Lebanon continue to enjoy good relations.At issue between the United States and Lebanon are progress toward a Lebanon-Israel peace treaty and U.S. aid to Lebanon.The United States supports Lebanon's independence and favored the end of Israeli and Syrian occupation of parts of Lebanon.Israel withdrew from southern Lebanon on May 23, 2000.An estimated 6,000 Syrian troops withdrew from the Beirut area in July 2001, leaving about 20,000 Syrians in Lebanon.From 1987 until July 1997, the United States banned travel to Lebanon because of the threat of kidnapping and dangers from the ongoing civil war.Presidents Eisenhower and Reagan said the United States had "vital" interests in Lebanon, but others might describe U.S. interests in Lebanon as less than vital.A large Lebanese-American community follows U.S.-Lebanon relations closely.The United States also watches events in Lebanon because Lebanon is a party to the Arab-Israel dispute.Lebanon is rebuilding after the 1975-1990 civil war.According to estimates, more than 100,000 people died, another 200,000 were wounded, 250,000 emigrated to avoid the fighting, and as many as one-third of the 3 million population were refugees in the Lebanon civil war.Syrian armed forces, invited into Lebanon in 1976 to prevent a Muslim attack on the Christians, continue to occupy the northern and eastern parts of the country.Israeli forces invaded southern Lebanon in 1982 and occupied a 10-mile-wide strip along the Israel-Lebanon border until May 23, 2000.Lebanon's government is based in part on a 1943 agreement that called for a Maronite Christian President, a Sunni Muslim Prime Minister, and a Shia Muslim Speaker of the National Assembly, and stipulated that the National Assembly seats and civil service jobs be distributed according to a ratio of 6 Christians to 5 Muslims.On August 21, 1990, the Lebanon National Assembly adopted the "Taif" reforms (called "Taif" after the Saudi Arabian city where they were negotiated).The parliament was increased to 128 to be divided evenly between Christians and Muslim-Druze, presidential authority was decreased, and the Speaker's and the Prime Minister's authority was increased.President Ilyas Hirawi signed the constitutional amendment implementing the reforms on September 21, 1990.Lebanon held elections for the National Assembly in 1992 and again in 1996.In the 1996 election, the extreme left and the extreme right lost to moderates, but the moderate victory also was a victory for Syria, which supported moderate, and not extremist, candidates.Speaker Birri and Prime Minister Hariri each controlled blocs of about 20 seats.The National Assembly elected Emile Lahud President on October 15, 1998.Other CRS reports on Lebanon include CRS Issue Brief IB92075, Syria: U.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.674
Threshold uncertainty score0.962

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0120.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0120.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3260.255

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas)French-language works237,207