MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7134408437

Green perspectives

2012· book-chapter· en· W7134408437 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael Cahill

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Brighton Repository (University of Brighton) · 2012
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion, Ecology, and Ethics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlobeGlobal warmingClimate changeFlooding (psychology)Greenhouse effectPoliticsQuarter (Canadian coin)Government (linguistics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chapter 14: Green Perspectives Michael Cahill •The environmental damage produced by our economic system is all too plain to see in oil spills, greenhouse gases, loss of the rain forests, traffic pollution and many other consequences of the industrial way of life. •Widespread loss of life is predicted in the coming decades as global warming leads to changed weather patterns. The human cost is already manifesting across the globe as drought, hurricanes and flooding has produce hundreds of thousands of ‘environmental refugees’. •Over the last quarter of the twentieth century concern for the environment has moved from the province of small, uninfluential pressure groups to the agenda of the world’s leading nations. •There are many varieties of green thought but they are all united in their belief that the environment should take priority in social and political discussion. •Climate change is persuading governments around the world to take environmental issues much more seriously than they have in the past.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.169
Threshold uncertainty score0.567

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1690.048

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Brighton Repository (University of Brighton)Same topicReligion, Ecology, and EthicsFrench-language works237,207