MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7134450802

Ethical Aspect of Social Control: Contemporary Discourse on Integrity of Institutions, Corruption, and Organised Crime

2015· article· sr· W7134450802 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRepository of the Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory (University of Belgrade, Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory) · 2015
Typearticle
Languagesr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicGraphic Design and Typography
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomic JusticePunishment (psychology)Criminal justiceEthical values
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sagledavanje etičkog aspekta zauzima centralno mesto u odlučivanju koje uključuje diskrecionu moć, silu i pravni postupak. U okviru savremenih krivično–pravnih sistema, etika je osnov odlučivanja i u pitanjima rukovođenja i u sferi politike kažnjavanja, odn. odlučivanja o prevenciji, kažnjavanju i rehabilitaciji. Uprkos tome što je savremeni pristup suzbijanju kriminala koncept koji obuhvata više domena javne politike, etika je i dalje fundamentalni aspekt krivičnog pravosuđa i društvene kontrole. Uvidi predstavljeni u ovom članku daju polaznu osnovu za razmatranje ključnih problema prevencije kriminaliteta danas, kao i za dizajn relevantne javne politike u Srbiji. Autorka analizira savremene trendove politike kontrole kriminaliteta predstavljene u strateškim inicijativama u oblastima kontrole kriminala, jačanja integriteta i unapređivanja etičke kompetencije koje su bile pokretane sa ciljem povećanja efikasnosti krivično–pravnog sistema. Ilustrovanjem načina na koje su savremena društvena kontrola i etika međusobno povezane i zavisne, autorka fokusira dobrobit koncipiranu u tradiciji društvenog konstruktivizma koji podrazumeva da je dobrobit proizvod specifičnog opšteg konteksta ljudskog života. Upućivanjem na već ustanovljenu praksu u najrazvijenijim državama (SAD, Kanada i EU) i najznačajnijim međunarodnim organizacijama (UN i OECD), u radu se ukazuje na potencijal razvijanja i procene javne politike sa stanovišta dobrobiti. Ethical considerations are central to decisions involving discretion, force, and due process. Within contemporary criminal justice systems, ethics is germane to most management and policy decisions relating to punishment and is the rationale used in making these decisions, such as whether to rehabilitate, deter, or impose just deserts. Despite that contemporary crime reduction approach is a concept which cuts across policy areas, ethics remains to be the fundamental aspect of criminal justice and social control. That said, the research outlined in this article provides a starting point to address the fundamental obstacles placed in the path of crime prevention and for future alternative constructions policies in this area, in Serbia. The paper offers an analysis of contemporary crime control policy trends as outlined in strategic initiatives aiming at crime control, integrity building, and advancement of ethical competencies have contributed to the effectiveness of the criminal justice system. By illustrating the ways in which contemporary social control and ethics are interconnected and interdependent, the author is focusing well–being as it is conceptualised in the tradition of the social constructionism that implies that well–being is a product of the specific overall context of one’s life. Finally, the author points out that in the most developed countries such as the USA, Canada and the EU, as well as the most influential international organisations such as the UN and the OECD, the development and evaluation of public policies on the basis of well–being monitoring is already an established practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.020
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it