Bibliographic record
Abstract
Title: Collection, 1900-1950s Description:4 linear ft. Notes: Afro-American concert pianist. Personal and family papers, correspondence, biographical writings, numerous concert programs, photographs, memorabilia, interview tapes and transcripts, and recordings relating to Harrison's career in the United States, Europe, and Canada; together with her music collection, including autographed copies of single compositions, music albums, and piano scores. Includes research materials compiled by Constance Hobson and Jean E. Cazort for their book, Born to Play: The Life and Career of Hazel Harrison (1983). Gifts of Hazel Harrison, 1969, Constance Hobson, 1981-1982, and Constance Hobson and Jean E. Cazort, 1986. Access to recordings is restricted. Subjects: Afro-American women musicians. lcsh Cazort, Jean E. Concert programs. lcsh Hobson, Constance Tibbs. Interviews. lcsh Pianists. lcsh Sheet music. aat Location: Howard University, Moorland-Spingarn Research Center (Washington, DC) NIDS Fiche #: 4.72.141 NUCMC #: DCLV96-A449
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.296 | 0.093 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".