MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7134539777

Ana Rivera

2019· article· W7134539777 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ana Rivera

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarly Commons (Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University) · 2019
Typearticle
Language
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpace exploration and regulation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpace ShuttleService (business)BoomSpace (punctuation)System integrationLaunched
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ana Rivera is a senior program integration manager in the Program Business Office of NASA’s Launch Services Program (LSP) at the John F. Kennedy Space Center in Florida. As Program Integration Manager, she serves as a key member of the mission integration team. She is responsible for participating in the initiation, planning, and execution of all matters associated with launch service contracts and associated mission budgets. Ana began her career with NASA in 2005 with the Shuttle Processing Directorate as an electrical engineer. In this role, she served as a Remote Manipulator System (RMS) engineer and was responsible for processing, integration, and testing of the Space Shuttle RMS, also known as the Canada arm, and the inspection boom assembly. During her tenure with the Shuttle Program, Ana also served on a Source Evaluation Board in support of the Constellation Program. In 2010, she began serving as a business integration engineer in the LSP Business Office and moved into her current role in 2013. Ana was born and raised on Florida’s Space Coast. She graduated with a Bachelor’s of Science degree in Electrical Engineering and a Master’s of Science degree in Industrial Engineering from the University of Florida in Gainesville. Ana currently resides in Merritt Island, FL with her husband and their young daughter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.884
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.005
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarly Commons (Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University)Same topicSpace exploration and regulationFrench-language works237,207