MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7134569170

Geodisy : Geospatial + Discovery, Canadian Research Data

2019· other· en· W7134569170 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Erin Fields, Evan Thornberry, Stephanie Savage, Leonora Crema, Aleha McCauley

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2019
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeospatial analysisScholarshipDowntownDigital scholarshipOfficerEvent (particle physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Open Scholarship UBC Library Round-Up was a lightning talks event for Open Education Week 2019 to showcase UBC Library’s open scholarship practices. Presentations included: Pressbooks TLEF Grant Project (Leonora Crema), Tri-agency compliance research (Stephanie Savage), Open Advocacy and Research Fellowship Research and CARL Visiting Program Officer in Open Education (Erin Fields), Downtown Eastside Project (Aleha McCauley), and the CANARIE Geospatial Federated Search Grant (Evan Thornberry).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.998
Threshold uncertainty score0.597

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.015
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0110.004
Open science0.0020.008
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1780.076

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)→French-language works237,207→