Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genetics: Human Aspects, 2d ed., by Arthur P. Mange and Elaine Johansen Mange. Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer Associates, 1989. 591 pp. $38.95. (Reviewed by Gabriel W. Lasker, Wayne State University)\nHuman Biology and Behavior, 5th ed., by Mark L. Weiss and Alan E. Mann. Glenview, 111.: Scott Foresman/Little, Brown, 1990. 624 pp. $33.95 (cloth). (Reviewed by Kenneth A.R. Kennedy, Cornell University)\nThe Anatomy and Biology of the Human Skeleton, by Gentry Steele and Claud A. Bramblett. College Station, Tx.: Texas A&M University Press, 1988. 291 pp. $55.00. (Reviewed by M. Anne Katzenberg, University of Calgary)\nEvolutionary Jurisprudence: Prospects and Limitations on the Use of Modern Darwinism throughout the Legal Process, by John H. Beckstrom. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1989. 168 pp. $24.95. (Reviewed by Eugenie C. Scott, National Center for Science Education)\nPhysical Anthropology, 4th ed., by Philip L. Stein and Bruce M. Rowe. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1989. 512 pp., glossary. $32.95 (softcover). (Reviewed by Martin K. Nickels, Illinois State University)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.034 | 0.253 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it