Kazimierz Nitsch in Olsztyn in 1956 : a recovered "lecture in dialectology"
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 1906 Prof. Kazimierz Nitsch conducted a dialectological research in the Warmia-Masuria region, which was not only important for his own description of Polish dialects, but also for the Poles who inhabited the area - at that time East Prussia, a province of the German Empire. In the fiftieth anniversary of the event, a formal meeting was organized with the scholar in Olsztyn, the main part of which took place in the knight’s chamber of the Olsztyn castle. Kazimierz Nitsch w Olsztynie w 1956 r. 205 Recently, a recording of K. Nitsch’s speech has been found in the collections of the Department of Dialectology at the Institute of Polish Philology of A. Mickiewicz University in Poznań. It is probably the only recording of the voice of the great linguist. For this reason, we publish both the transcript and the original recording, available at www.lingvaria.polonistyka.uj.edu.pl/ nagranie-wystapienia-prof.-k.-nitscha_1956-r.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".