Geography of childhood in Alice's Adventures in Wonderland (1865) of Lewis Carroll, Le Avventure di Pinocchio (1883) of Carlo Collodi, Peter Pan (1911) of James Matthew Barrie, and Le Petit Prince (1943) of Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette thèse intitulée « Géographies de l’'enfance dans Alice's Adventures in Wonderland [1865] de Lewis Carroll, Le Avventure di Pinocchio [1883] de Carlo Collodi, Peter Pan [1911] de James Matthew Barrie et Le Petit Prince [1943] d'Antoine de Saint-Exupéry » s'intéresse, à partir d'une étude sur le traitement spatial, aux notions d'espace, de lieu et de monde de l’'enfance. Il s’'agit en effet d'aborder ces quatre ouvrages de littérature enfantine, non pas sous l'angle du personnage, mais sur la relation entre la géographie mise en place dans la narration et leur succès visible encore aujourd’hui. Si la rêverie de l’'enfance semble être au centre de la formation de mondes, c’'est sa matérialisation spatiale impromptue et éphémère qu'il faut retenir comme créatrice de lieux mythiques. En confrontant l'illusion enfantine, la relation entre espaces fantastique et espace merveilleux, la spatialisation des désirs enfantins et la dématérialisation de territoires par le souvenir et le conte, les hypothèses formulées dans cette thèse s’inscrivent dans les études sur les littératures de l'imaginaire et placent la spatialisation d’'une rêverie vers l'enfance au centre du propos.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".