Land to the r/o The Royal George, 57 High Street, Stagsden, Archaeological Evaluation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to determine the archaeological risk posed by a proposal to develop land at The Royal George PH, 57 High Street, Stagsden Bedfordshire, the Heritage Network was commissioned by the developers to undertake a programme of archaeological evaluation. Four trial trenches were opened across the proposed development area. The investigation showed that the southern side of the site has been subject to post-medieval and modern disturbance. The majority of the dateable features encountered on the site were of the modern period. These include two postholes in Trench 1, cuts [102] and [105], demolition debris and modern disturbance in Trench 2 and the car park surface, contexts (400) and (401) for the former Royal George public house in Trench 4. The remaining features and layers, including cut [303] in Trench 3 and layer (403) in Trench 4 appear to date to the post-medieval period, indicated by the presence of brick fragments in both the upper fill of [303] and in layer (403). Two possible natural features were also observed in Trench 1, cuts [104] and [107]. These are likely to represent root action in the rear garden of the former public house.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".