MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7134896863 · doi:10.66298/kerwa.2024.5.3.1

Origin and development of sitting volleyball, history of the development of sitting volleyball in Korea

2024· article· W7134896863 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kyo-In Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueKorea Exercise Rehabilitation Welfare Association · 2024
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Cord Injury Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSittingRehabilitationAthletesFirst world warDisabled peopleMovement (music)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study is to investigate the origin and development of sitting volleyball, as well as its introduction and development in Korea, and to contribute to the completion of the study of the history of sports on the process. The conclusions drawn from this study are as follows. First, sitting volleyball, which originated at Stoke Mandeville Hospital in England during the healing and rehabilitation of war disabled people, was introduced to the Netherlands, and after further development, it was completed as sitting volleyball. After the first sitting volleyball competition was held in the Netherlands, it was adopted as a demonstration sport at the Toronto Paralympics. After that, the first World Championships were held in Haarlem, Netherlands, and it was adopted as an official sport at the Arnhem Paralympics, where it continues to this day. Sitting volleyball was officially adopted by ISOD, the international organization for disabled sports, and WOVD, the international organization for sitting volleyball, was formed. Sitting volleyball, which began about 100 years ago for the healing and rehabilitation of war disabled people, developed along with other disabled sports by forming its own council and joining internationally recognized organizations. By granting world rankings through the World Championships and thus granting Paralympic qualification, it has established itself as a popular disabled sport. Second, sitting volleyball in Korea was introduced after the 1988 Seoul Paralympic Games, and continued with various national disabled volleyball competitions, and was adopted as an official event of the National Disabled Sports Games, and has grown rapidly up to the present. In addition, it has continuously participated in international competitions, such as the Asian Para Games and the World Championships, and has raised its international status. With this increased international status, it was possible to successfully host the World Championships, and has greatly contributed to the revitalization and development of international disabled sitting volleyball by successfully hosting and hosting all three major competitions in the history of international sitting volleyball development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKorea Exercise Rehabilitation Welfare Association→Same topicSpinal Cord Injury Research→French-language works237,207→